Hey everybody, I'm kind of new posting here, so first of i just want to introduce myself and say hello.  This topic interests me some, but just like many people, I have my doubts about its' credibility.    The first concern I have is teacher credentials.  I am part of a family of 3 teachers and understand the process that goes into becoming a teacher quite well.  Years of determination, practice and ongoing learning are required to perfect the skill of teaching.  For people to simply come up and say they are able to teach their own children without the proper training and education worries me.  What kind of experience do you have to make up for the credentials required of state approved teachers?  If that is in place, fine, start teaching.   Besides the academic aspect of the school system, the social aspect is just as if not more important.  There is really only so much a child can learn from books.  Group activities, social networking and  peer to peer interaction are such valuable tools in today's society that I could not imagine someone being neglected of it.  I do understand when teenagers especially voice their freedom and talk about how their skills are not being met, but that is just an excuse for laziness.  There are several options for students to exercise their skills if they feel underachieved.   I just find conventional schooling to be such a powerful tool for young people that home schooling just sounds so limited.  Sure there are temptations such as drugs and violence, but as long as parents raise their children to be smarter than the people who pressure them into it, they would be fine.  It makes them stronger individuals in the long run.  If anyone thinks I am wrong in what I have said, I would love to hear your opinion. 
Hello, I'm a homeschool mother of 3. I've made it a rule not to engage in DEBATES over my rights as a parent. Yes, that's right, it is my right as a parent, in this country, to homeschool my children.___ Never fear! My children are doing just fine, thank you. My question to you would be this. Why do you feel the need to come to a homeschool message board and bash homeschoolers? Do you not have better things to do?
LOL, I would also like to address you saying that " There is only so much a child can learn from books." I find this to be both ironic and hilarious. It seems also that you feel homeschool children are deprived of social interaction. It is obvious to me that while you may know alot about formal teaching in a school setting, you know next to nothing about REAL homeschooling. Most homeschoolers are involved in lots of "after school activites" such as Boy/Girl scouts, 4H, sports, art/music classes, just to name a very few. And yes, I do have a [filtered word]y attitude about this. Because basically people like you feel free to make ignorant comments in public forums about my and others' parenting rights/abilities. Honestly, do you not see how rude it is to do that?
Teachers in classrooms do need a lot of schooling, not just to address the subject matter, but also to try to address moving 10 or 30 or 100 individuals through the curriculum and through the social dynamic of a classroom. And the 100--not an exaggeration, a high school teacher with five 20-student classes, that is a conservative estimate.
I think it would be worrisome to expect someone to teach in a classroom setting without the kind of training you delineate.
The purpose of that training is to address the deficiencies of scale that occur when the relationship between learner and mentor is diluted.
As far as the social aspect, the deficiencies of the classroom in socializing children are legion and well-documented. Removing children from the care of their primary care-givers for 900 plus waking hours a year is not optimal for the children, it is supportive of industrialized society. I learned that in my "Philosophy of Education" class, I think the Index in the catalog was a 2200 number.
One is not well-socialized by one's peers. Read "Lord of the Flies" as if it were just a story. The reason it is a powerful metaphor is because it rings true as just a story.
I have heard of bad home-school situations--third hand. The home-schools that I have observed and participated in are most like graduate level seminars. Statistically, home-schooled children do better academically, socially, and professionally than their peers in the classroom. Also, statistically they spend more time in books than their peers. Also, statistically, they spend more time in learning hands-on than their peers.
Alright, I agree that I may have come off a little strong, but a lot of the things you talked about, do not relate to what I said. I never said its "not your right." Go right ahead. The only point I was making is what kind of government/educational approval did you earn to teach your children? I don't ask that in a condecending way, but as a simple question.
Did I address your concern adequately? You are falling into the same trap as the others--it is not the government's right to approve who educates children, it is the parent's. This is acknowledged in that public schools are governed by elected school boards. (At least in my state, don't know about anybody else.)
Synergy, MY point was, I do not need Your " go ahead" to educate my children at home. As far as "earning" anyone's approval.... I don't have to. I have met my state's legal requirements to homeschool. That's all I HAVE to do. These are my children and I know what is right for them.
Synergy, my point was that conventional schooling is the system that needs to prove itself. Parents (even those with minimal formal education) who are willing to invest the time and energy in their child's education find that their child learns more, has better social skills, and better emotional development than do the children who attend the neighborhood public or private school. In my opinion, if you have left your child to conventional schooling for twelve or thirteen years, you have deprived your child of a valuable learning experience. It is particularly beneficial in the middle years, Grades Four through Eight.